J. Convictions on Direct Appeal
The Supreme Court held in Pino v. Landon,[1] that generally a conviction must attain some degree of finality under state or federal court procedure before it can be used as a basis for deportation/removal. Thus, a conviction on direct appeal will not be considered sufficiently final for purposes of deportation/removal of the noncitizen defendant. Although some government attorneys have argued that an appealed conviction will support deportation under the new definition, no relevant precedent supports this argument.[2] In practice, convictions clearly on direct appeal of right still are being held not to constitute a conviction for immigration purposes. Thus, where appropriate, counsel should file late appeals to criminal convictions. While pending, the convictions on such appeals cannot serve as a basis for deportation or removal.
[1] Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 (1955).
[2] However, the Fifth Circuit has held that the statutory definition of conviction erodes the requirement of finality, in a complex procedural situation. This reasoning, however, violates a number of well-established rules of statutory construction. Moosa v. INS, 171 F.3d 994 (5th Cir. 1999)(ruling on Texas deferred adjudication statute that held limited appeal rights). See also Matter of Punu, supra n. 52.